From meeting the obligation to competitive strength: I guide mid-sized manufacturers through the ESPR and product-specific requirements. Together, from the initial assessment to a customised DPP.
Arrange an intro callAs part of the BMWK research project ELSTA, I initiated and guided the creation of DIN DKE SPEC 99100, the first German standard to technically define all data attributes of the EU battery passport. This SPEC serves as a model for further Digital Product Passports under the ESPR. I continue to follow the ongoing standardization work in CEN/CENELEC JTC 24, the European standardization committee for the DPP.
Click an arrow or actor for more details.
All dates are based on the ESPR working plan 2025–2030. Each delegated act triggers an 18-month transition period.
I analyse your product portfolio: which products are affected and when? Where are the data gaps? The result: a clear roadmap with prioritised actions.
Together we develop the data structure for your DPP and a supplier questionnaire for structured data collection along your supply chain.
Together we design a first working, customised Digital Product Passport, including a QR code, a viewer with role-based visibility and PDF export.
Supplier data Müller KT, verified 01/2025
Verified by TÜV Rheinland 03/2025
Want this passport for your products? → Arrange a call now
Enter product data, generate an ESPR-compliant product passport and a GS1 QR code, hosted and publicly accessible by scan. Starting with the battery passport, built for further ESPR product groups such as textiles, furniture and electronics. With team accounts and role-based access for recyclers and authorities.
To the DPP platform → Prefer some guidance? Arrange an intro call →Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR) requires in Article 10(4) that a backup copy of the product passport be available through a service provider when the product is placed on the market. Article 2(32) requires that provider to be an independent third party. The backup must therefore not sit where the passport itself sits.
What this is good for only shows once a manufacturer leaves the market. General access to the passport then becomes available (EN 18221, clause 4.3). A product passport should outlive the company that issued it.
I offer this because these data are, to my mind, the part of the circular economy that disappears most easily. A company files for insolvency, the server is switched off, and with it go the details on material, repair and recovery.
Passports are stored as they arrive and returned unchanged. They are never translated into someone else's data model.
A stored version is never altered and never deleted. A correction is a new version; the old one stays retrievable.
Every file carries a SHA-256 checksum. That a version is unchanged can be recomputed with ordinary tools.
The archive is ordinary files with an explanation alongside. Readable without this service and without me.
Competitors included: if your passports live on another platform, the backup can still sit here. The regulation demands independence anyway. Conversely, I am never both main and backup provider for the same customer. For the customers of my own platform I engage a third provider.
Integration follows the EN 18222 lifecycle API over HTTPS per EN 18216. Attached documents such as test reports are included (EN 18221, clause 4.4).
The service takes in passports with the first custody agreement. Get in touch if you need a backup copy, or are still working out who should hold it.